Opinion: Clarifying the rules of engagement
At the last City Council meeting, Seth Brigham, a citizen of Boulder and former council candidate, was arrested by the police after attempting to raise issues about the behavior of certain sitting council members. The city manager has provided a detailed account, as well as recommendations to minimize future problems. But the fundamental issues are still unresolved. What caused all the trouble was the council`s rule that “speakers engaging in personal attacks may be interrupted by the mayor.” The notion of “personal attacks” is vague, the word “may” allows arbitrary application, and the rule is inappropriate since many times citizens come before council specifically to criticize the actions of council members. What exactly is a citizen supposed to do if they disagree with the actions of a specific council member? If they criticize that person, they could be shut down. And what if the mayor “interrupts” one person but not another who says something very similar? Is there any recours