Opinion: Opportunity for the new Boulder City Council
Congratulations to the four new
Boulder City Council members! You have a great opportunity to make a
contribution to the Boulder community, but it will take a lot of work to do it
responsibly; the learning curve is pretty steep. Here are some suggestions for
you (and other Council members) that may help improve the process.
Read the Charter. It is the
document that governs how you, city staff, and board and commission members
operate, and how you relate to each other. It defines the limits of your and
their power, and can only be amended by a citizen vote. You don’t have to remember
every word. But just knowing what’s there makes you more self reliant and less
at the mercy of others’ opinions.
For example,
relative to the recent meeting discussion over diversity, the council
does not have the power to suspend the rules as to when the mayor is
selected. Charter Section 14 specifies, “The mayor shall be chosen by the
council from its own number, upon the convening of the new council, following
each general municipal election.” So the mayoral selection should have been the
first order of business last Tuesday evening. By the way, for those who
evaluate people by category, since the early 1980s, when I first got involved,
half of the mayors have been women.
Also, scan
through the Boulder Revised Code. For example, B.R.C. 9-2-14, “Site Review,” gives a sense of Boulder’s confusing and
arbitrary approval processes. In particular, note the 29 sections of the B.R.C.
that can be “modified,” meaning ignored. I suggest putting a link to the Charter and B.R.C. on your computer.
The goal setting session in January
is a chance to start on the right foot. After some tries, our Council found a
process that worked. Here it is, with some additions:
• Make each initiative or project
operational by reducing it to what specifically can get done in the next two
years. This includes ongoing staff efforts, so nothing significant is left out
of the discussion.
• Let whoever is advocating the
project take a few minutes to present it; then the rest of the Council and
staff critique it; finally, take a vote to see if a Council majority supports
pursuing it.
• Then evaluate the approved goals
for time, effort and cost, and then prioritize and winnow them down to a list
that looks feasible, knowing that unanticipated items will come up. The
objective here is to clarify exactly what is to be accomplished, and also to
set limits, so that the citizens are not left in the dark and worried that
vague goals will expand in ways no one expected.
The Council Agenda Committee has a
critical role in the process. Its primary function is to vet the meeting agenda
materials to make sure that they are concise, clear, and address all the issues
that are likely to be brought up. One useful approach is to have the three CAC
members try to think of questions the other Council members and citizens will
have, and make sure that there are answers. If not, the item goes back to the
staff for more work. This review can save an enormous amount of meeting time —
something that you will come to value dearly.
Another action that can really help
is for the CAC to invite citizens who are particularly knowledgeable on a topic
to testify at the Council meeting or study session, and then for Council
members to ask them questions. Boulder citizens are plenty smart and involved;
having them participate in this way both gives the Council a chance to become
more educated (remember, Council members and city staff don’t know everything)
and also reduces the sense that citizens often get when testifying that they
are talking to a glass wall.
The use of working groups takes
advantage of experts and involved citizens to help develop the more complex
projects. They worked very well in revising elections and marijuana laws, for
example, and could help with proposed ADU/co-op law changes, which are bound to
create controversy, and the online petition process. Working groups also ensure
that non-staff perspectives are included, and avoid the paranoia that many
citizens have that critical decisions are being made in the dark.
The more
significant the project, the more citizen involvement is necessary. It’s more
efficient and productive, and citizens will feel that the results better
represent what they want. And finally, if you make a mistake, please acknowledge
it publicly, so that trust is restored.